- SAKO RIIHIMAKI .222 SERIAL NUMBERS SERIAL NUMBER
- SAKO RIIHIMAKI .222 SERIAL NUMBERS FULL
- SAKO RIIHIMAKI .222 SERIAL NUMBERS PORTABLE
SAKO RIIHIMAKI .222 SERIAL NUMBERS PORTABLE
You- “Theres new technology, what da fug why aren’t we using it!” The Rest of The World- “It is expensive and the cost benfit ratio does not pay out” You- “Well fine then, besides eastern guns are better!!!!!!111!one” So, tell us then, if it is in fact a “myth” about the mature technology for case less ammunition, energy weapons in a man portable form with efficient power supply units slightly more portable than an aircraft carrier, and just how exactly we can make guns so much cheaper and perhaps people would reconsider their position on the topic.
SAKO RIIHIMAKI .222 SERIAL NUMBERS FULL
I just wish they had a wee bit more in COAL space A GP-11 firing MAS in custom chassis with a pile of hi caps good glass and full precision shooters accessories pack would be about the most frightening modernized ER SDM option I can imagine. When I get discretionary spending money I can allocate to buying fun guns much of it goes into buying MAS parts and donor guns. What you won’t see is low cost and perfectly adequate stampings! First on this subject you should really stop by weaponsguild and peruse the thread by Barnbwt which has lots of very high quality pictures of the internals of an SPP (Which while earlier steyr built are close enough in construction to have parts commonality) inside it’s gorgeous polymer shell you’ll see a nightmare of complexity close tolerances and disappointing amounts of polymer used for very critical components. The SR2 & MP9 are NOT in any way similar in construction or more importantly for the purposes of my point COMPLEXITY. I’m going to break down piece by piece where you went wrong in your last response on the SR2 / MP9. Where and how exactly would you get the impression that this is the case? Also in reference to the MP9 Versus the SR2 Veresk, no I didn’t choose the MP9 due to astronomical Swiss labor costsEspecially since I specifically brought up the whole normalizing labor costs thing specifically lol No the reason I brought up the MP9 & SR2 veresk is they are fundamentally extremely similar, but show quite visibly the differences in the two philosophies. Such a scope can be mounted (preferably with rings contemporaneous with the rifle) low enough to offer practical eye alignment and be much better adapted to real world shooting.Umm The glock is not even close to cheaper than a gsh Nathaniel.
I'd recommend replacing the scope with one which has no objective bell and will sit to the rear of the ladder sight. The problem with this is that the L46 stock comb is rather low, so with the very high scope mounting you will find it impossible for your cheek to even touch the stock when your eye is aligned with the scope. The mounts are very high, as they have to be with this particular scope since it has to clear the ladder sight. The scope mounts are very late Sako Optilocks from the 2000's, which seem out of place on a rifle 50 years older. I do have one strong criticism of the way it is set up. While it is a very desirable rifle, this model is not scarce enough to be what most people would regard as "collectible".
Such a rifle is only "collectible" in the sense that a Sako enthusiast might want one like it if he didn't already have one.
SAKO RIIHIMAKI .222 SERIAL NUMBERS SERIAL NUMBER
Its serial number likely places it somewhere in the mid-1950's, but as Paulson says, that can be misleading and the only way to know when it was made is to consult the Club's factory records service. You’d be surprised of how much one can find out about a person from just a username on a forum such ad our! Then use the report function in each message or post so I can kick them out!īeware of anything that might seem fishy!Īnd again, for all of you who registered your personal name as username, please contact me so I can change it to a more anonymous username. Check them too and if they are long standing members, PM them and ask if the message is legit. Same goes for other members they might refer to. If they have no posts and signed up the same day or very recently, stay away. Email him at: ”Ĭheck the status of whoever message you. Saw your post about purchasing a stock for a Safari. The reply contains a gmail or hotmail address or similar ”anonymous” email addresses which they want you to reply to. They register and replies to members requests for guns and/or parts or other things.
Lately there has been more and more scammers on the forum board.